Assessment of Learning LET REVIEWER
Professional Education Lesson 36:
Modes of Assessment
Traditional and authentic assessment are two major modes of assessment that teachers use for different but complementary purposes. Traditional assessment relies mainly on paper‑and‑pencil tests, while authentic assessment emphasizes real‑life tasks and performance.
Modes of Assessment
When planning how to assess students, teachers can choose
from traditional and authentic assessment
modes. Traditional assessment usually asks students to select or
construct answers on paper, often in controlled, artificial situations.
Authentic assessment asks students to perform real‑world tasks that
show how they apply what they have learned in meaningful contexts.
- Modes
of assessment include traditional (paper‑and‑pencil
tests) and authentic (performance/alternative)
assessment.
- Traditional
assessment is often decontextualized (separated from real
life), while authentic assessment is contextualized (based
on real‑life situations).
- Both
modes are useful and should complement each other, not
compete.
Traditional Assessment
Traditional assessment refers to conventional, paper‑and‑pencil
tests, often standardized and usually given in classrooms under time
limits. These tests typically focus on how well students remember facts,
understand concepts, or follow learned procedures in a structured format.
Traditional assessment is also called decontextualized
assessment because it checks declarative knowledge (knowing
facts) and procedural knowledge (knowing steps) in artificial
situations that are often detached from real‑world use.
- Traditional
assessment uses paper‑and‑pencil tests to measure what
students know or can do in controlled settings.
- It is
often decontextualized, focusing on knowledge and procedures
in situations that do not directly mirror real life.
- It is
common in quizzes, exams, and standardized tests.
Selected‑Response Type of Tests
In selected‑response tests, students choose
an answer from options given. These are quick to score and can cover a
wide range of content.
Common selected‑response types:
- Example:
“Water boils at 100°C at sea level. True or False?”
- Example:
“Which gas do plants take in during photosynthesis? A. Oxygen B. Carbon
dioxide C. Nitrogen D. Hydrogen”
- Example:
Match scientists to their discoveries.
Constructed‑Response Type of Tests
In constructed‑response tests, students
must produce their own answers instead of choosing from
options. These items show and test the student deeper understanding but take more time to
answer and score.
Common constructed‑response types:
- Example: “Define photosynthesis.”
- Example: “Explain the difference between formative and summative assessment.”
- Example: Solving a word problem in algebra.
Strengths and Limits of Traditional Assessment
Traditional assessment is widely used because it is
familiar, relatively efficient, and easier to score objectively, especially the
selected‑response types. However, it often provides only an indirect
view of what students can do in real life and tends to emphasize lower‑order
thinking skills like remembering and understanding.
- Strengths:
efficient, easy to administer and score, good for broad content
coverage.
- Limits:
often decontextualized and may not show how students
apply learning in real‑world situations.
- Best
used together with authentic assessment.
Authentic Assessment
Authentic assessment is also called performance, alternative,
or non‑traditional assessment. It asks students to perform
real‑life tasks that show meaningful application of knowledge and
skills. Instead of just telling what they know, students must do
something that mirrors real‑world demands.
Authentic assessment is contextualized: tasks
are placed in a real‑life or realistic context, requiring students
to use higher order thinking skills (HOTS) such as analyzing,
evaluating, and creating, not just remembering.
- Authentic
assessment involves real‑world tasks that directly
demonstrate how students apply what they have learned.
- It
is contextualized, meaning tasks are designed to be as close
as possible to real‑life situations.
- It is
often called performance or alternative assessment
and focuses strongly on higher order thinking skills (HOTS).
Types of Authentic Assessment
Authentic assessment can be organized into two broad forms: product and performance.
Product‑Based Authentic Assessment
In product‑based authentic assessment, students create
a tangible output that demonstrates their understanding and
skills.
Examples of products:
- Science model, business plan, prototype, or artwork.
- Graphs, posters, infographics, collages that summarize or explain concepts.
- Written reflections where students connect learning to their experiences or evaluate their own progress.
Performance‑Based Authentic Assessment
In performance‑based authentic assessment, students carry
out a task or performance in front of an audience or as part
of a process.
Examples of performances:
- Teaching a short micro‑lesson, leading a group discussion, role‑playing a scenario.
- Conducting a science experiment following proper procedures and drawing conclusions.
- Presenting a research report, pitching a project, delivering a speech.
- Acting out a historical event, performing a skit, or doing a role play in language class.
Why Authentic Assessment Is “Authentic”
Authentic assessment is considered “authentic” because
it assesses knowledge and skills in a context that is very similar to
real life. Instead of answering decontextualized questions, students must:
- Apply
knowledge to realistic problems.
- Make
decisions, create products, or perform tasks similar to what
professionals, citizens, or consumers do.
- Use higher‑order
thinking skills, such as analyzing information, solving complex
problems, and reflecting on their learning.
- Authentic
assessment emphasizes application of learning rather than
just recall.
- It
provides direct evidence of competence by asking students
to perform tasks, not just answer questions.
- It is
especially useful for assessing 21st‑century skills like
critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration.
How Traditional and Authentic Assessment Complement Each Other
Traditional and authentic assessments are not enemies
|
Aspect |
Traditional Assessment |
Authentic Assessment |
|
Main
format |
Paper‑and‑pencil
tests (selected/constructed response) |
Real‑world
products and performances |
|
Typical
tasks |
Alternate
response, multiple choice, matching, short answer, essay, problem solving |
Projects,
experiments, presentations, role plays, portfolios |
|
Knowledge
focus |
Often
declarative/procedural in artificial contexts (decontextualized) |
Application
of knowledge in realistic contexts (contextualized) |
|
Evidence
of learning |
Often indirect
(right answers on test items) |
Direct
demonstration of skill/competency |
|
Cognitive
level |
Tends
to emphasize lower‑order skills (remembering, understanding) |
Strong
focus on higher‑order thinking (analysis, synthesis, evaluation) |
|
Strengths |
Efficient,
easy to score, covers broad content |
Rich,
meaningful, shows what students can do |
|
Limitation |
May not
show transfer to real‑life tasks |
More
time‑consuming; scoring can be more complex |
- Traditional
assessment is good for broad coverage and objective
scoring, especially for basic knowledge and procedures.
- Authentic
assessment is good for assessing application, creativity, and
complex skills in realistic tasks.
- Using both
together gives a more complete picture of student
learning than either one alone.
Situational Example:
Imagine you are teaching photosynthesis in science:
Traditional assessment
- A multiple‑choice quiz on the equation of photosynthesis and the role of chlorophyll.
- A short‑answer item: “Explain why plants are called producers.”
- Students design a poster or infographic explaining photosynthesis for younger pupils (product).
- Groups conduct a simple experiment on light and plant growth and present their findings orally (performance).
In this case:
- The
traditional quiz checks if students remember and understand the facts.
- The
authentic tasks check if students can explain and apply those
facts to create something meaningful and communicate it, skills closer to
real‑life situation.
- Traditional
tests confirm content mastery.
- Authentic
tasks reveal application, explanation, and communication skills.
- Together,
they provide stronger evidence for grading and feedback.
